The digital divide shifts to differences in usage

By A. V. van Deursen, J. V. van Dijk. New Media & Society, 2014

1,380 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Media Technology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4001b1991cc2798e7b9a9af6e38904b01bc3ab70

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. J. V. van Dijk
2. A. V. van Deursen
3. Katy E. Pearce
4. Bertie Vidgen
5. Ellen J. Helsper
6. Ronald E. Rice
7. Leon Derczynski
8. Ruth Festl

In Media Technology

1. A. V. van Deursen
2. Ellen J. Helsper
3. J. V. van Dijk
4. Leon Derczynski
5. Bertie Vidgen
6. Ronald E. Rice
7. Katy E. Pearce
8. Thomas N. Friemel

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. V. van Dijk
2. A. V. van Deursen
3. Ellen J. Helsper
4. Leon Derczynski
5. Bertie Vidgen
6. Katy E. Pearce
7. Ronald E. Rice
8. Ruth Festl

Citations in the corpus

• Directions in abusive language training data, a systematic review: Garbage in, garbage out (2020, background): “Social science research indicates that ‘digital divides’ exist, whereby online users are not representative of wider populations and may vary between different online spaces [84, 87, 88].”
• The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access (2018, background): “In addition to Internet skills, Internet usage is part of the second-level digital divide and can be defined in terms of frequency and the type of activities performed, both of which have their own grounds of determination (e.g. Blank and Groselj, 2014; Van Deursen and Van Dijk, 2014).”
• Directions in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Out (2020, background): “Social science research indicates that ‘digital divides’ exist, whereby online users are not representative of wider populations and differ across different online spaces [12, 76, 105].”
• Digital Divides From Access to Activities: Comparing Mobile and Personal Computer Internet Users (2013, background): “…that factors affecting the access gap also affect the usage gap, but in varying levels and for varying usage types. van Dijk (2005, Chapter 6) and van Deursen and van Dijk (2013) argue that the usage gap is broader than the knowledge gap because it includes practices, technologies, and…”
• The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online? (2015, background): “The sample represented the Dutch population (see van Deursen et al., 2014).”