Implicit and explicit attitudes respond differently to increasing amounts of counterattitudinal information

By Robert J. Rydell, Allen R. McConnell, Laura M. Strain, Heather M. Claypool, Kurt Hugenberg. 2007

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40000fd838462c92dd88fd0bbe4f978f2ac46660

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Social-Psychological Interventions for Intergroup Reconciliation: An Emotion Regulation Perspective (2016, background): “Drawing on a growing body of literature suggesting that implicit beliefs about the malleability of groups (e.g., Rydell et al., 2007) can be changed, the researchers examined whether an intervention designed to promote an incremental view of the malleability of groups would lead to reduced levels…”
Understanding the Relationship between Attribute-Based and Metaphor-Based Dehumanization (2009, background): “Further, although explicit attitudes are sensitive to small amounts of counterattitudinal information, implicit attitudes gained using this technique are highly resistant to change (Gregg et al., 2006; Rydell et al., 2007).”
12. Formation, change, and contextualization of mental associations: determinants and principles of variations in implicit measures (2010, result): “This conclusion is in line with findings by both Sassenberg and Moskowitz (2005), who showed that a procedural priming manipulation to "think different" effectively reduced implicit stereotyping, and Stewart and Payne (2008), who demonstrated similar effects for implementation intentions to think…”
Changing explicit and implicit attitudes: The case of self-esteem (2009, background): “Thus, consistent with the assumptions of recent dual-process models (Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006; Rydell et al., 2006), implicit self-esteem was affected when an associative learning procedure was used to modify self-related evaluative associations in memory while explicit self-esteem was influenc”