Physiological effects of dominance hierarchies within groups of brown trout, Salmo trutta, held under simulated natural conditions

By Katherine A. Sloman, K. Gilmour, A. C. Taylor, N. Metcalfe. Fish Physiology & Biochemistry, 2004

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes (2005, background): “…groups, the relationship between dominance status and corticosteroid levels is less clear ; hormone titres can correlate positively, negatively, or not at all with social rank (e.g. Overli et al., 1999b ; Sloman et al., 2000; Muller & Wrangham, 2004; Sands & Creel, 2004; Weingrill et al., 2004).”
Effect of stocking density on growth performance, serum biochemical parameters, and muscle texture properties of genetically improved farm tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (2018, background): “Different letters in a row represent significant differences (P < 0.05) Several factors are known to suppress growth in high stocking densities, such as social interaction and deteriorating water quality (Sloman et al. 2000; Ellis et al. 2002).”
Phenotype management: a new approach to habitat restoration (2003, background): “This uneven distribution of food may allow some juveniles to establish foraging territories and grow more quickly than those that cannot (Fausch, 1984; Sloman et al., 2000).”