Agricultural Household Models: Genesis, Evolution, and Extensions

By J. Taylor, I. Adelman. 2003

472 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3fd5adff1475b86dc722229579a46e685351767b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. H. El-Osta
2. Matthieu Clément

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. A. Angelsen
2. D. Solís
3. B. Bravo-Ureta
4. Sven Wunder
5. R. Babigumira
6. H. El-Osta
7. R. Quiroga
8. J. Taylor

In Soil Science

1. A. Angelsen
2. D. Solís
3. R. Babigumira
4. S. Bauch
5. M. Buis
6. Sven Wunder
7. T. Sunderland
8. Geoffrey Kiprotich Sigei

Citations in the corpus

• Forest Clearing in Rural Livelihoods: Household-Level Global-Comparative Evidence (2014, methodology): “The agricultural household model (Barnum & Squire, 1979; Singh, Squire, & Strauss, 1986b) has served as the workhorse for investigating the economic behavior of households (LaFave, 2011; Taylor & Adelman, 2003).”
• Technical Efficiency among Peasant Farmers Participating in Natural Resource Management Programmes in Central America (2009, background): “Technical Efficiency and Resource Management Programmes with the view that in developing countries family and hired labour may not be perfect substitutes and thus should be treated as separate inputs (Taylor and Adelman, 2003).”
• Missing markets and crop diversity: evidence from Mexico (2005, background): “It is also the producer, combining its labor, land, and other capital with purchased inputs to produce agricultural commodities either for consumption or sale to markets subject to resource and market constraints (Singh et al., 1986; de Janvry et al., 1991; Taylor and Adelman, 2002).”
• The Impact of Coupled and Decoupled Government Subsidies on Off-Farm Labor Participation of U.S. Farm Operators (2006, background): “A related extension of the basic labor– leisure model is found in the household production literature (see Gronau (1977) for an Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3581966 example and Taylor and Adelman (2003) for a recent review).”
• Agricultural Productivity and Poverty Reduction: Linkages and Pathways (2011, unknown): “Households will react differently to cash crop production opportunities and derive different welfare benefits from participation due to the heterogeneity and complexity of production systems and asset endowments (Taylor and Adelman 2003, Brooks and Dyer 2008).”