The Future of the Capitalist State
By Maria Markantonatou. 2005
1,193 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3fc855eb403d6ea286128f16e28f8c49239c5b3e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Political Science and International Relations
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Making policy with ‘good ideas’: policy networks and the ‘intellectuals’ of New Labour (2010, neutral): “A key role is argued for ‘innovation intermediaries’ or ‘brokers’ (as indicated above) and ‘technology transfer companies’ – what Jessop (2002) calls ‘link’ and ‘lead’ organisations – and ‘innovation bazaars’ and exchanges are advocated.”
- Globalisation or ‘glocalisation’? Networks, territories and rescaling (2004, background): “…from or outside a parallel political or institutional organisation, i.e. a set of territorially constructed institutional arrangements that simultaneously provide some social coherence while permitting and encouraging the extended rearrangement of these economic networks (Jessop 2002).”
- Shifting horizons in local and regional development (2017, background): “National governments sought to reallocate economic activity from faster growing regions with capacity constraints to slower growing regions with capacity surpluses (‘Spatial Keynesianism’) (Jessop, 2002; Brenner, 2004).”
- Introduction: Collaborative innovation in the public sector (2012, background): “Since the management of collaborative innovation involves the governance of self-governance it can be seen as a form of metagovernance (Jessop, 2002; Kooiman, 2003).”
- Privatising education, privatising education policy, privatising educational research: network governance and the ‘competition state’ (2009, background): “…over policy and in some respects (Marinetto (2003) and certainly in education) has achieved an enhancement of ‘capacity to project its influence and secure its objectives by mobilizing knowledge and power resources from influential non-governmental partners or stakeholders’ (Jessop 2002, 199).”
- The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism (2005, background): “The notion of regulatory capitalism sits quite comfortably with these revisionists’ views of the market and the relations between state and economy.”
- Evolution in Economic Geography: Institutions, Political Economy, and Adaptation (2009, background): “Although such policy engagement is in many senses welcome, there is a risk of evolutionary concepts being uncritically embraced by policymakers and absorbed into the meta- or “master narrative” of the knowledge economy (Jessop 2002; Jones 2008).”
- Flexicurity: A conceptual critique (2011, background): “With the neoclassical market as the ultimate inspiration, the state increasingly became a ‘competition state’ (Jessop, 2002), to which social progress is subordinated to and dependent on economic success.”
- Advancing Evolutionary Economic Geography by Engaged Pluralism (2014, background): “A second line of argument, influenced by the work of JACOBS (1970), argues that diversity is essential for innovation and creativity.”
- Metagoverning Collaborative Innovation in Governance Networks (2017, background): “As such, metagovernance refers to a specific kind of second- and third-order governance that aims to improve the functioning and capacity of relatively selfgoverning networks to produce governance solutions that enhance the production of public value (Jessop, 2002; Kooiman, 2003; Torfing et al., 201”
- Green pretexts: Ecotourism, neoliberal conservation and land grabbing in Tayrona National Natural Park, Colombia (2012, background): “On the contrary, one can speak of a capitalist state (Jessop 2002) at the service of private capital accumulation.”
- POLITICAL ECONOMY OF INFORMALIZATION (2010, background): “Thus the coping strategies of the state, according to Jessop (2002), in reality result in one concession after another to big business; instead of full employment, the focus is increasingly on the importance of competitiveness; instead of guaranteed welfare rights, the focus is on so-called…”
- Varieties of academic capitalism and entrepreneurial universities (2017, background): “…also demands to transfer state activities into a commercial, market or capitalist economy where these are deemed to lie outside the state’s core functions, to organize these through internal markets inside the state or to use various market proxies to simulate competition (see Jessop 2002).”
- THE SUBSIDIARIZATION OF SOCIAL POLICIES: ACTORS, PROCESSES AND IMPACTS (2008, background): “Since the second half of the 1970s, the internationalization and globalization of economic relations western industrialized countries have resulted in a rapid increase of inflation rates and unemployment, accompanied by a drop in economic growth rates and the weakening of the regulative capacity of ”
- Advocacy networks, choice and private schooling of the poor in India (2010, background): “The first rests on a set of neoliberal arguments about more or less radical destatalization (Jessop 2002), subjecting state organizations to competition and/or the handing over of service delivery to the private sector.”
- Rise of China and the global overaccumulation crisis (2008, background): “The decentralization of economic governance in globalizing China is remarkably comparable with the post-Keynesian ‘rescaling of statehood’ in North Atlantic economies (Brenner, 2004; Jessop, 2002; cf. Chen, 2005; Yeung, 2000).”