VIP: Towards Universal Visual Reward and Representation via Value-Implicit Pre-Training

By Yecheng Jason Ma, Shagun Sodhani, Dinesh Jayaraman, Osbert Bastani, Vikash Kumar, Amy Zhang. International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022

495 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Reward and representation learning are two long-standing challenges for learning an expanding set of robot manipulation skills from sensory observations. Given the inherent cost and scarcity of in-domain, task-specific robot data, learning from large, diverse, offline human videos has emerged as a promising path towards acquiring a generally useful visual representation for control; however, how these human videos can be used for general-purpose reward learning remains an open question. We introduce $\textbf{V}$alue-$\textbf{I}$mplicit $\textbf{P}$re-training (VIP), a self-supervised pre-trained visual representation capable of generating dense and smooth reward functions for unseen robotic tasks. VIP casts representation learning from human videos as an offline goal-conditioned reinforcement learning problem and derives a self-supervised dual goal-conditioned value-function objective that does not depend on actions, enabling pre-training on unlabeled human videos. Theoretically, VIP can be understood as a novel implicit time contrastive objective that generates a temporally smooth embedding, enabling the value function to be implicitly defined via the embedding distance, which can then be used to construct the reward for any goal-image specified downstream task. Trained on large-scale Ego4D human videos and without any fine-tuning on in-domain, task-specific data, VIP's frozen representation can provide dense visual reward for an extensive set of simulated and $\textbf{real-robot}$ tasks, enabling diverse reward-based visual control methods and significantly outperforming all prior pre-trained representations. Notably, VIP can enable simple, $\textbf{few-shot}$ offline RL on a suite of real-world robot tasks with as few as 20 trajectories.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3fbe2e8413df0207c26ff393c9aaa8488e3ca4c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Chelsea Finn
  3. Pieter Abbeel
  4. Li Fei-Fei
  5. Trevor Darrell
  6. Mohit Bansal
  7. Abhinav Kumar Gupta
  8. Yoshua Bengio

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Chelsea Finn
  2. Sergey Levine
  3. Pieter Abbeel
  4. Tianhe Yu
  5. Xiaolong Wang
  6. Peter Stone
  7. Pierre Sermanet
  8. Aravind Rajeswaran

In Neurology

  1. Tianhe Yu
  2. Jitendra Malik
  3. Yu Qiao
  4. Hao Su
  5. Pieter Abbeel
  6. Dhruv Batra
  7. Yuke Zhu
  8. Jifeng Dai

Citations in the corpus