Like Uber, But for Local Governmental Policy: The Future of Local Regulation of the 'Sharing Economy'

By Daniel E. Rauch, David Schleicher. 2015

228 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f811946a4ad00ed3617a2b2010c5a4e500cc9a0

Citations in the corpus

• Scoping the Sharing Economy: Origins, Definitions, Impact and Regulatory Issues (2016, unknown): “Nonetheless, Airbnb, RelayRides and Uber offer some kind of guarantee and insurance (Rauch & Schleicher, 2015; Thierer et al., 2015).”
• Conceptualizing the Sharing Economy through Presenting a Comprehensive Framework (2018, unknown): “However, in the standpoint presented by Rauch and Schleicher (2016), the relationships in the SE are not necessarily between two parties other than the provider of the platform, as the asset or service provider may be the company providing the online platform itself [112].”
• The Passions and the Interests: Unpacking the 'Sharing Economy' (2016, unknown): “Incidents reported for Uber drivers and/or with Airbnb hosts have raised concerns about the fact that suppliers of lift and rental services are not required to obtain licenses, permits, or certification (i.e. Sablik, 2014; Rauch & Schleicher, 2015).”
• Ridesourcing systems: A framework and review (2019, unknown): “Rauch and Schleicher (2015) offer three predictions of the approaches governments will take toward the sharing economy in the medium-term future: Cities will (i) subsidize sharing firms to motivate them to enter or expand certain services; (ii) harness sharing firms for economic redistribution; and…”
• Consumer adoption of the Uber mobile application: Insights from diffusion of innovation theory and technology acceptance model (2018, unknown): “…on the business or governmental perspective, such as impact of Airbnb on the tourism industry (Oskam & Boswijk, 2016), local regulations of Uber (Rauch & Schleicher, 2015), how to overcome regulations as a barrier (Cannon & Summers, 2014), impacts on global sustainability (Cohen & Kietzmann,…”
• Sharing economy: A review and agenda for future research (2016, unknown): “Governments are also concerned that many tourism SE start-ups bypass government regulations and overhead costs that will have a series of impacts on consumer rights, safety and quality as well as disability compliance standards (Juul, 2015; Rauch and Schleicher, 2015).”
• Sharing cities and sustainable consumption and production: towards an integrated framework (2016, unknown): “Despite the attractiveness and evident relevance of the sharing economy in urban settings, cities are sometimes resistant to certain sharing activities, as has been observed by legal changes brought to Airbnb in New York City and to Uber in Brussels (Rauch and Schleicher, 2015).”