Cost-effectiveness assessment of CO2 reducing measures in shipping

By M. Eide, Ø. Endresen, R. Skjong, Tore Longva, Sverre Alvik. 2009

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f6a560c139fb2581d4c7760a5a9357d8635d6b6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

1. Jomon Aliyas Paul
2. Michael J. Maloni
3. David M. Gligor
4. T. Zis

In Environmental Engineering

1. Jomon Aliyas Paul
2. Michael J. Maloni
3. David M. Gligor
4. T. Zis

Citations in the corpus

• Market-based measures for greenhouse gas emissions from ships: a review (2012, background): “Several attempts to construct MAC curves are known, see for instance Alvik et al. (2009); Eide et al. (2010) and IMAREST (2011).”
• Future cost scenarios for reduction of ship CO2 emissions (2011, methodology): “[17] investigates the cost effectiveness of several measures applied to two case ships, indicating that the cost effective reduction potential is substantial.”
• Slow steaming impacts on ocean carriers and shippers (2013, background): “Despite other emission-reduction options like hull design changes, routing, propeller polishing and kite systems (Eide et al, 2009; Notteboom and Vernimme, 2009), slow steaming represents an immediate approach for carriers to improve their environmental impacts (Eide et al, 2009; Rosenthal, 2010).”
• Barriers to energy efficiency in shipping: A triangulated approach to investigate the principal agent problem (2015, unknown): “(Eide et al., 2009; Buhaug et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2010) have been”