Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round 6

By John Moult, Krzysztof Fidelis, Burkhard Rost, Tim Hubbard, Anna Tramontano. 2005

238 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER (2007, unknown): “The approach is based on the natural dissection of the protein structures into conserved core regions, variable loops that connect them, and side chains that decorate the backbone.”
RNA-Puzzles toolkit: a computational resource of RNA 3D structure benchmark datasets, structure manipulation, and evaluation tools (2019, background): “CASP (Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction) (4) is the largest worldwide event of protein structure prediction.”
New statistical potential for quality assessment of protein models and a survey of energy functions (2010, methodology): “Predicted models for 143 targets collected from the CASP5-CASP8 experiments [49] were used as decoys, including a total of 2628 models produced by a large variety of groups and methods.”
3D-Jury: A Simple Approach to Improve Protein Structure Predictions (2003, methodology): “As a result, the number of prediction services available on the internet that participated in last year's CASP-5 and CAFASP-3 experiments has almost doubled compared to the numbers from the previous experiments, conducted three years ago.”
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using Modeller (2006, background): “Possible future improvements of modeling by rigid-body assembly include incorporation of rigid body shifts, such as the relative shifts in the packing of a helices and β -sheets (Nagarajaram et al., 1999).”