Information aggregation in debate: who should speak first? ☆

243 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

When Does Coordination Require Centralization (2006, unknown): “We can also use (42) to evaluate dΠC/dλ: dΠC dλ = −(4) 3 (δ1 + δ2) 1 + 2 (δ1 + δ2) σ(2) for λ = 1/2.”
Information Aggregation in Polls (2008, background): “…multiple experts with perfect information on the communication game (e.g., Gilligan and Krehbiel 1987 and 1989; Krishna and Morgan 2001a and 2001b; Ottaviani and Sorensen 2001; and Battaglini 2002); other work has considered the e¤ect of multiple experts but with noisy information (e.g.,…”
The Wrong Kind of Transparency (2005, unknown): “7 The third approach — the expert agent model (Scharfstein and Stein [37], Zwiebel [40], Prendergast and Stole [34], Ottaviani and Sørensen [28] [29], Levy [23]) — is the one that is used here.”
Herd Behaviour and Cascading in Capital Markets: A Review and Synthesis (2003, background): “Ottaviani and Sorenson (2000) explore the relation between reputational herding and informational cascades.”
Groupthink: Collective Delusions in Organizations and Markets (2013, background): “Thus, when the quality of their information is unknown, agents whose opinion is at odds with most already expressed may keep it to themselves, for fear of appearing incompetent or lazy (Ottaviani and Sørensen (2001), Prat (2005)).”
Deliberation and Voting Rules (2005, background): “4 Examples include Battaglini (2002), Glazer and Rubinstein (2001), Ottaviani and Sorensen (2001) , Krishna”