Null Hypothesis Significance Testing: Effect Size Matters
By J. Gliner, Jerry J. Vaske, George A. Morgan. 2001
50 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ee8539d7cabf1158501298ca5c008a97e60d6d1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Statistics and Probability
- Lori B. Shelby
- Jerry J. Vaske
- M. Manfredo
- D. Whittaker
- Robert Arlinghaus
- T. Klefoth
- T. Pieterek
- Mark D. Needham
Citations in the corpus
- Impacts of domestication on angling vulnerability of common carp, Cyprinus carpio: the role of learning, foraging behaviour and food preferences (2013, methodology): “To quantify the explanatory power of the results, effect sizes d for paired t-tests were calculated following the approach outlined in Gliner et al. (2001) and interpreted as weak (d 0.2), medium (d 0.5) or strong (d 0.8) effects following Cohen (1988).”
- An Extension and Further Validation of the Potential for Conflict Index (2010, unknown): “For example, some researchers (eg, Cohen, 1988 ; Gliner, Vaske, & Morgan, 2001 ; Vaske, 2008 ) have suggested that a Pearson's r correlation of .”
- Specificity and the Cognitive Hierarchy: Value Orientations and the Acceptability of Urban Wildlife Management Actions (2006, background): “Based on the cognitive hierarchy’s specificity principle and prior wildlife value orientation research (Fulton et al. 1996; Bright et al. 2000; Gliner et al. 2001; Manfredo et al. 2003; 2004), this article advances three hypotheses: H1: General, protection–use and appreciation wildlife value…”
- Understanding Meta-Analysis: A Review of the Methodological Literature (2008, methodology): “Meta analyses performed across all studies (i.e., those with and those without statistical significance) will more accurately reflect the strength of the relationship (Gliner et al., 2001; Schmitt, 1996; Vaske et al., 2002).”
- Socioeconomic factors influencing customary marine tenure in the Indo-Pacific (2005, unknown): “…the mean socioeconomic conditions of the two groups (e.g., mean distance to market of the communities that employed exclusive marine tenure regimes minus the mean distance to market of the communities that did not) divided by the pooled standard deviation of both groups (Gliner et al. 2001).”
- Communicating Judgments About Practical Significance: Effect Size, Confidence Intervals and Odds Ratios (2002, methodology): “Gliner et al. (2001) illustrated the relationship between statistical significance and effect size.”