Anaphora and Language Design

299 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Understanding heritage languages (2019, background): “Second, recovery of missing information also imposes additional cognitive demands, as indicated in a number of phenomena: the processing of ellipsis (e.g., Koornneef et al., 2011; Reuland, 2011), pronoun ambiguity resolution (e.”
Language and Other Cognitive Systems. What Is Special About Language? (2011, background): “For a sophisticated study of binding theory, within the minimalist program as it is actually understood, see Reuland (2011). quickly as possible in comprehension.7 Hence, the facts might rely on an innate constraint but not one that is domain specific.”
Problems of projection (2013, background): “…Principle), etc. N. Chomsky / Lingua 130 (2013) 33--49 35 A sensible approach to the discovery of violation of generally valid observations is captured in Eric Reuland's remark on early proposals about binding theory 30 years ago: ''Too bad to be true, too good to be false'' (Reuland, 2011).”