Spatially resolved X-ray spectroscopy of cooling clusters of galaxies

By J. Kaastra, T. Tamura, J. R. Peterson, J. Bleeker, C. Ferrigno, S. Kahn, F. Paerels, R. Piffaretti, G. Branduardi‐Raymont, H. Böhringer. 2003

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present spatially resolved X-ray spectra taken with the EPIC cameras of XMM-Newton of a sample of 17 cooling clusters and three non-cooling clusters for comparison. The deprojected spectra are analyzed with a multi-temperature model, independent of any a priori assumptions about the physics behind the cooling and heating mechanisms. All cooling clusters show a central decrement of the average temperature, most of them of a factor of ∼2. Three clusters (Sersic 159−3, MKW 3s and Hydra A) only show a weak temperature decrement, while two others (A 399 and A 2052) have a very strong temperature decrement. All cooling clusters show a weak pressure gradient in the core. More important, at each radius within the cooling region the gas is not isothermal. The differential emission measure distribution shows a strong peak near the maximum (ambient) temperature, with a steep decline towards lower temperatures, approximately proportional to T 3 , or alternatively a cut-off at about a quarter to half of the maximum temperature. In general, we find a poor correlation between radio flux of the central galaxy and the temperature decrement of the cooling flow. This is interpreted as evidence that except for a few cases (like the Hydra A cluster) heating by a central AGN is not the most common cause of weak cooling flows. We investigate the role of heat conduction by electrons and find that the theoretically predicted conductivity rates are not high enough to balance radiation losses. The differential emission measure distribution has remarkable similarities with the predictions from coronal magnetic loop models. Also the physical processes involved (radiative cooling, thermal conduction along the loops, gravity) are similar for clusters loops and coronal loops. If coronal loop models apply to clusters, we find that a few hundred loops per scale height should be present. The typical loop sizes deduced from the observed emission measure distribution are consistent with the characteristic magnetic field sizes deduced from Faraday rotation measurements.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ebddd067904e0c2d890beb6bbf9b038042fa387

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. H. Böhringer
  2. Stefano Borgani
  3. G. Mark Voit
  4. M. Arnaud
  5. N. Werner
  6. B. McNamara
  7. P. Nulsen
  8. G. Pratt

Citations in the corpus