Differences in the Usage of Bootstrap Financing among Technology‐Based versus Nontechnology‐Based Firms

By Howard E. Van Auken. 2005

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3eb91de52bce2c0b708da7931dcefd68029680f7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. C. Brush
2. P. Greene
3. Nancy M. Carter
4. E. Gatewood
5. M. Hart
6. Purnima Rao
7. Satish Kumar
8. Dilani Jayawarna

In Strategy and Management

1. P. Greene
2. Purnima Rao
3. C. Brush
4. Satish Kumar
5. E. Gatewood
6. M. Hart
7. Nancy M. Carter

Citations in the corpus

• The use of bootstrapping by women entrepreneurs in positioning for growth (2006, methodology): “Using items developed by Landstrom and Winborg (1995) and used previously by Van Osnabrugge and Robinson (2000); Winborg and Landstrom (2001); Van Auken (2001, 2005) and Harrison et al. (2004), we asked respondents about their use of various bootstrapping options.”
• Beyond environmental scarcity: Human and social capital as driving forces of bootstrapping activities (2014, unknown): “…In particular, the limited access to financial capital through market-based exchanges – ultimately leading to finance constraints –would force entrepreneurs to engage in bootstrapping activities (Ebben, 2009; Ebben and Johnson, 2006; Sapienza et al., 2003; Van Auken, 2005; Venkataraman, 2003).”
• A conceptual framework for identifying financing preferences of SMEs (2015, background): “Auken (2005) introduced a model that explains the dynamics of the capital structure decisions of SMEs and pointed out the significance of attitudes and characteristics owner-managers.”