Phylogenetic systematics of Glassfrogs (Amphibia: Centrolenidae) and their sister taxon Allophryne ruthveni

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. (2011, background): “…frogs (van der Meijden et al., 2007), bufonid frogs (Pauly et al., 2004; Pramuk et al., 2008; Van Bocxlaer et al., 2009), centrolenid frogs (Guayasamin et al., 2009), dendrobatid frogs (Grant et al., 2006; Santos et al., 2009), hemiphractid frogs (Wiens et al., 2007a), hylid frogs…”
Systematics of the Neotropical Genus Leptodactylus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae): Phylogeny, the Relevance of Non-molecular Evidence, and Species Accounts (2014, background): “Several studies (e.g., Frost et al., 2006; Guayasamin et al., 2009) have found centrolenids and Allophryne ruthveni (variably treated as a centrolenid or as a separate family) to be sister to Leptodactylidae whereas others (e.”
Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness (COVER) (2011, background): “Phylogenetic analyses support a sister relationship between these clades (Austin et al., 2002; Faivovich et al., 2005; Wiens et al., 2005; Frost et al., 2006; Guayasamin et al., 2008), but the revision by Guayasamin et al. (2009) maintained Allophrynidae and Centrolenidae as separate families.”