The Optimal Income Taxation of Couples

242 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Knowledge of Future Job Loss and Implications for Unemployment Insurance (2017, unknown): “5, following Kleven et al. (2009)), and also correct for the fact that the regressions estimate dφ dZ as opposed to dφ dp .”
Tax–benefit revealed social preferences (2010, background): “Alternatively it would be necessary to write down a model of household income taxation explicitly accounting for both spouses’ participation but this is out of the scope of this paper (see [19]).”
Adjustment Costs, Firm Responses, and Micro vs. Macro Labor Supply Elasticities: Evidence from Danish Tax Records (2011, unknown): “Another example concerns the prediction that it is optimal to levy higher tax rates on men than women because they are less elastic (Boskin and Sheshinski 1983; Alesina, Ichino and Karabarbounis 2007; Kleven, Kreiner, and Saez 2009).”
Means-testing and tax rates on earnings: a contribution to the Mirrlees Review (2009, background): “Hence, the results in Kleven et al. (2006) suggest that Means-testing and Tax Rates on Earnings 125 the broad way in which tax and benefit systems of many OECD countries treat the incomes of a couple, including that of the UK, are consistent with optimal tax results.”