Tax–benefit revealed social preferences

By François Bourguignon, Amedeo Spadaro. Journal of Economic Inequality, 2010

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8b5457289bba72c7f0e15fe098f6d3e9ada7ba4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. F. Figari
2. M. Weinzierl
3. Holly Sutherland

In Gender Studies

1. M. Weinzierl
2. Holly Sutherland
3. F. Figari
4. M. Ravallion

Citations in the corpus

• EUROMOD: the European Union tax-benefit microsimulation model (2012, background): “…and elasticities are a key ingredient in a series of papers on the optimality of tax systems and welfare regimes (Bargain et al., 2011; 2012a; Bourguignon and Spadaro, 2012; Immervoll et al., 2007; 2011) and the cross-country perspective offered by EUROMOD proves to shed new light in this…”
• A Unified Welfare Analysis of Government Policies* (2019, unknown): “Because the MVPF is a shadow price, one can use a standard decision-theoretic framework to quantify 9We arrive at these conclusions using the logic of the inverse optimum approach (e.g. Bourguignon and Spadaro (2012)).”
• The Promise of Positive Optimal Taxation (2014, background): “Bourguignon and Spadaro (2012) take the former approach to calibrating the welfare weights in a standard model.”