The Factor Structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Psychometric Properties of the Parent and Teacher Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4- to 12-Year-Olds: A Review (2010, background): “…only four are presented in Table 5 (Palmieri and Smith 2007; Van Leeuwen et al. 2006; Van Roy et al. 2008; Sanne et al. 2009) because four out of the total of eight studies did not report factor loadings (Becker et al. 2004; Dickey and Blumberg 2004; Hill and Hughes 2007; Mellor and Stokes 2007).”
When to Use Broader Internalising and Externalising Subscales Instead of the Hypothesised Five Subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Data from British Parents, Teachers and Children (2010, background): “CFAs in Norway (youth SDQ) and Australia (parent, teacher and youth SDQ) found that models based on the hypothesised five factors did not show acceptable model fit for some or all indices considered (Mellor & Stokes, 2007; Ronning, Handegaard, Sourander, & Morch, 2004).”