Indirect effects of host-specific biological control agents

By D. Pearson, R. Callaway. 2003

244 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3da1db3fcd2c80123108a52c8ed2ffcc3753c423

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

The role of pre-release efficacy assessment in selecting classical biological control agents for weeds—applying the Anna Karenina principle (2005, background): “This food subsidy has led to increases in deer mouse populations and raised concerns about possible increased transmission of hantavirus, a pathogen deadly to humans (Ortega et al., 2004; Pearson, 1999; Pearson and Callaway, 2003; Pearson et al., 2000).”
Classical biological control: exploiting enemy escape to manage plant invasions (2008, background): “We will then concentrate on classical biological control to mitigate the negative effects of invasive plants, and discuss a few key issues that we consider crucial for a safe, efficient and successful biocontrol project, and that have also caused some recent controversy (Louda et al. 2003; Pearson ”
Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biology (2006, background): “These more complex interactions should also be taken into account when developing control strategies for invasive species, for instance Pearson & Callaway (2003) emphasize the importance of identifying likely non-target indirect effects of potential biocontrol agents.”
Biological control of forest plantation pests in an interconnected world requires greater international focus (2012, background): “Still other ecological costs have been incurred due to indirect community-level effects, which are difficult or impossible to anticipate based on laboratory or even controlled field studies (Pearson and Callaway 2003, 2005).”
Insect herbivory stimulates allelopathic exudation by an invasive plant and the suppression of natives (2005, background): “However, these successes are rare (Maron & Vilà 2001; Agrawal & Kotanen 2003) and unexpected indirect effects (Pearson & Callaway 2003), and the stimulation of complex underground biochemical responses such as those demonstrated in this study indicate that the use of biocontrol insects should be…”
Risks of biological control for conservation purposes (2012, background): “…of increased populations of deer mice, a generalist predator, are unknown but could include seed predation of native plants, competition with other small mammals, predation on and competition with insects, and even increased transmission of the hantavirus to humans (Pearson and Callaway 2003).”
Novel Weapons: Invasive Success and the Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability (2004, background): “So far, biocontrol has not been successful (Müller-Schärer and Schroeder 1993; Pearson and Callaway 2003), suggesting that the lack of specialist insect herbivores is a minor component of its invasive success.”
Exotic biological control agents: A solution or contribution to arthropod invasions? (2016, background): “most commonly cited form is apparent competition (Pearson and Callaway 2003).”
Shifting paradigms in the history of classical biological control (2018, background): “This latter pattern suggests that the biological control community has made progress in reducing risks of direct non-target impacts but that there is scope for improvement in minimizing risks of indirect nontarget impacts (Wajnberg et al. 2001; Pearson and Callaway 2003; Kaser and Heimpel 2015; Kase”
Can Invasive Species Facilitate Native Species? Evidence of How, When, and Why These Impacts Occur (2006, background): “In other words, ‘direct effects of the biological control agent on its intended host translate into an indirect positive effect on native species’ ( Pearson and Callaway 2003 ).Forest restoration efforts utilize facilitative effects of nonindigenous species to modify habitats and catalyze establishm”
Exploring the relationship between nichie breadth and invasion success (2006, background): “…exhibit unexpected host shifts in their introduced ranges (Simberloff and Stiling 1996, Henneman and Memmott 2001, van Klinken and Edwards 2002, Pearson and Callaway 2003), and these shifts are usually not the result of changes in the fundamental niche through rapid evolution, but an…”