Risks of biological control for conservation purposes

By Daniel Simberloff. BioControl (Dordrecht), 2012

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/14e1e56864ea6026d43e80f6cf6344a132aadc2c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

1. M. Cock
2. A. Hajek
3. Michael J. Wingfield
4. B. Hurley
5. M. Kenis
6. J. C. Lenteren

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Michael J. Wingfield
2. A. Hajek
3. B. Hurley
4. J. Garnas
5. M. Kenis

In Plant Science

1. Michael J. Wingfield
2. M. Cock
3. A. Hajek
4. B. Hurley
5. J. Garnas
6. M. Kenis
7. J. C. Lenteren
8. B. Slippers

Citations in the corpus

• Concepts for biocontrol in marine environments: is there a way forward? (2015, unknown): “There is a disparity between the amount of information available on non-target effects in terrestrial and freshwater biocontrol (Simberloff 2012) compared to marine systems, and the knowledge is not necessarily transferable (Bax et al. 2001).”
• Exotic biological control agents: A solution or contribution to arthropod invasions? (2016, background): “Predicting and/or testing for indirect effects is challenging (Karban 1994; Simberloff 2012) but recommendations call for greater focus on communities rather than pairwise interactions in both pre- and post-establishment monitoring.”