Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory

831 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Endangered, apparently: the role of apparent competition in endangered species conservation (2009, methodology): “We liken rR to overlap in resource preference often modeled in habitat suitability studies (Hirzel & LeLay, 2008), and rP to a comparison of Holt’s (1977) per-capita attack rates, a, among prey species (Noonburg & Byers, 2005).”
Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling. (2012, background): “…bioclimatic envelope models estimate potential distribu- tions (i.e., the geographic projection of the estimated realized niches of species), rather than the occupied distributional area of the species (Araújo and Guisan 2006, Soberón 2007, 2010, Hirzel and Lay 2008, Soberón and Nakamura 2009).”
Differential impact of landscape transformation on pumas (Puma concolor) and jaguars (Panthera onca) in the Upper Paraná Atlantic Forest (2011, methodology): “All variables were resampled to 330-m cells and coregistered with the land-use map, removing lakes and urban areas (Hirzel & Le Lay, 2008).”
Hotspots of plant invasion predicted by propagule pressure and ecosystem characteristics (2011, background): “…been dominant in predictions of weed spread and areas vulnerable to future invasion (e.g. Crossman & Bass, 2008; Keller et al., 2008; Ibáñez et al., 2009; Jacobs & MacIsaac, 2009), which may reflect the single-species approach of habitat suitability modelling more generally (Hirzel & Lay, 2008).”