Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling.

By Miguel B. Araújo, A. Townsend Peterson. Ecology, 2012

1,073 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8e6fce2a78f5dfd35b4257ebfe3f0b42a3ec5cb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Partial versus Full Species Distribution Models (2012, background): “…subject of ‘landscapes of interest’, it is important to clarify the differences in the definitions of the terms: ‘Bioclimatic envelope models’, ‘Ecological niche models (ENMs)’, ‘Habitat suitability models (HSMs)’ and ‘Species distribution models (SDMs)’, as proposed by Araújo and Peterson (2012).”
Tools for integrating range change, extinction risk and climate change information into conservation management (2013, background): “This is because ENMs only estimate the empirical relationships between species’ present-day distribution and environmental variables, and use the inferred relationships to identify potential distributional areas of the species under future climate scenarios (Araujo and Peterson 2012).”
The effects of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation on forecasts of species range shifts under climate change. (2014, methodology): “This hypothesis has rarely been explored in plants (Molina-Montenegro & Naya 2012; Ara ujo et al. 2013), but it has been repeatedly addressed and confirmed in different groups of animals (Calosi et al. 2008; Kellerman et al. 2009; Overgaard et al. 2011; Naya et al. 2012; Ara ujo et al. 2013).”
ENMeval: An R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for Maxent ecological niche models (2014, unknown): “…model specification (e.g. Ara ujo & Guisan 2006; Elith, Kearney & Phillips 2010; Anderson & Gonzalez 2011; Elith et al. 2011; Warren & Seifert 2011; Ara- ujo & Peterson 2012; Merow, Smith & Silander 2013; Shche- glovitova & Anderson 2013; Syfert, Smith & Coomes 2013; Radosavljevic & Anderson…”
The n‐dimensional hypervolume (2014, background): “While fundamental niches are often thought to have simpler and less holey geometry than realized niches (Colwell & Rangel, 2009; Araujo & Peterson, 2012), data limitations have precluded robust tests of this idea.”
Protected areas network is not adequate to protect a critically endangered East Africa Chelonian: Modelling distribution of pancake tortoise, Malacochersus tornieri under current and future climates (2020, background): “…problems (and not simple exploratory analyses), it is important to ensure that modeling decisions are biologically motivated by specific hypotheses, study goals, and species-specific considerations and reflect the intended a priori assumptions (Peterson et al. 2011, Araujo and Peterson 2012).”
Minimum required number of specimen records to develop accurate species distribution models (2016, background): “Species distribution models (SDMs) have been developed to overcome this lack of information (Guisan and Zimmermann 2000, Araujo and Peterson 2012) as they Minimum required number of specimen records to develop accurate species distribution models”
The geographic scaling of biotic interactions (2013, result): “…that consistency with predictions from alternative models lends to conditionally supporting them, but inconsistency leads to inconclusive results as we have no objective way to validate them unless we compare results with data (Oreskes et al. 1994, Araújo and Guisan 2006, Araújo and Peterson 2012).”
Areas of Climate Stability of Species Ranges in the Brazilian Cerrado: Disentangling Uncertainties Through Time (2012, methodology): “2012) involves the use of Ecological Niche Models (ENMs; also called Species Distribution Models – but see Araújo & Peterson (2012) and Peterson & Soberón (2012)).”
Ontario freshwater fishes demonstrate differing range‐boundary shifts in a warming climate (2014, background): “Models predicting changes in species distributions under various climate-change scenarios have mostly focused on abiotic factors (Ara ujo & Peterson, 2012); however, the role of species interactions (e.g. predator–prey relationships) in determining species distributions is beginning to receive…”
Paintings predict the distribution of species, or the challenge of selecting environmental predictors and evaluation statistics (2018, background): “We note, however, that many historical (von Humboldt & Bonpland, 1805; Wallace, 1876) and modern (Ara ujo & Peterson, 2012; Jim enez-Valverde, Barve et al., 2011; Thomas, 2010) empirical pieces of evidence demonstrate that climate plays a primary role in shaping species’ distributions not least of…”
Testing the predictive performance of distribution models (2013, unknown): “How widespread are these extrapolation types of applications of SDM’s for which our results are relevant? Araújo and Peterson (2012) recently reviewed applications of bioclimatic envelope models and ‘suggest that criticism has often been misplaced, resulting from confusion between what the models ac”
Traits to stay, traits to move: a review of functional traits to assess sensitivity and adaptive capacity of temperate and boreal trees to climate change (2016, background): “The velocity of range shifts depends on traits that affect each species’ ability to produce anddisperse seeds, aswell as establishviablepopulationsunder local site conditions (Thuiller et al. 2008; Angert et al. 2011; Araújo and Peterson 2012; Boulangeat et al. 2012; Beauregard and de Blois 2014).”
Connectivity for species on the move: supporting climate‐driven range shifts (2019, background): “SDMs also fail to account for important habitat requirements, including localized suitability for supporting population and metapopulation dynamics (Araújo and Peterson 2012), although mixed SDM–metapopulation models have been proposed (eg Aiello- Lammens et al. 2011; Conlisk et al. 2012).”