International Perspective on Government Nanotechnology Funding in 2005
By Mihail C. Roco. 2005
230 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d88d2896d879b512b63a9f968f60bba4a2cd103
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
In Economics and Econometrics
Citations in the corpus
- Nanomaterial Removal and Transformation During Biological Wastewater Treatment (2013, unknown): “…of ENMs to WWTPs as a major route for ENM disposal and a potential route into the environment for dispersed and some surface-attached product lines (Roco, 2005; Aitken et al ., 2006; Nowack and Bucheli, 2007; Mueller and Nowack, 2008; Nowack, 2009; Nowack et al ., 2009, 2012; Gottschalk et al .,…”
- The long view of nanotechnology development: the National Nanotechnology Initiative at 10 years (2011, methodology): “Budget estimates use the nanotechnology definition as defined by the NNI (this definition does not include MEMS, microelectronics, or general research on materials) (see [2, 23 ]; and http://nano.gov).”
- Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? (2008, background): “It is also expected that the field of nanotechnology will like ICT evolve in terms of complexity, with Roco (2004, 2005) suggesting that nanotechnology will undergo four generations of development over the next 20 years.”
- Ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to aquatic invertebrates: a brief review and recommendations for future toxicity testing (2008, background): “As the number of nano-scale applications is rapidly growing with future estimates of an ever-increasing development and use of nanomaterials ( Roco 2005; Dunphy Guzma ´n et al. 2006), an investigation into the effects on the aquatic environment from nanomaterial exposure is extremely important, par”