Trust and reciprocity : interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research

616 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Toward a more complete understanding of the reciprocity of liking effect (2008, methodology): “…has been successfully used to integrate affect and cognition into theory (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003; Rusbult, Van Lange, Wildschut, Yovetich, & Verette, 2000), to model interdependent relationships (Kelley et al., 2003), and to predict reciprocity in relationships (e.g., Ostrom & Walker, 2003).”
Mapping morality with a compass: Testing the theory of ‘morality-as-cooperation’ with a new questionnaire (2018, background): “In game theory, social dilemmas – prisoners dilemmas, public goods games, tragedies of the commons – arise when the fruits of cooperation are vulnerable to ‘free riders’, who accept the benefit of cooperation, without paying the cost (Ostrom & Walker, 2002).”
Parental background and other-regarding preferences in children (2014, background): “Our results are also consistent with Harbaugh et al. (2003a) and Benenson et al. (2007), who find that older children share more than the younger children in a standard dictator game.”
All for All: Equality and Social Trust (2005, background): “…can be seen in the Russell Sage Foundation’s large project on trust: among the forty-one chapters in the three edited volumes, none is about economic inequality and none of the volumes has an index entry on equality or inequality (Braithwaite and Levi 1998; Cook 2001; Ostrom and Walker 2003).”