The good practices manifesto: Overcoming bad practices pervasive in current research in business

By Arch G. Woodside. 2016

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d11bc31b16d2aa8d2ff6a7bbc257ee903ed8c1f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Norat Roig-Tierno
2. T. González-Cruz
3. Carla Ruiz
4. Jordi Llopis-Martinez
5. E. Bigné
6. Kalliopi Chatzipanagiotou

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Norat Roig-Tierno
2. T. González-Cruz
3. Carla Ruiz
4. Jordi Llopis-Martinez
5. E. Bigné
6. Kalliopi Chatzipanagiotou

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Norat Roig-Tierno
2. T. González-Cruz
3. Carla Ruiz
4. Jordi Llopis-Martinez
5. E. Bigné
6. Kalliopi Chatzipanagiotou

Citations in the corpus

• An overview of qualitative comparative analysis: A bibliometric analysis (2017, methodology): “…the adoption of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), which uses Boolean logic, has been growing, substituting traditional correlation methods to establish causal conditions related to a particular result (Ragin & Fiss, 2008; Ragin, 1987; Ragin, 2000; Ragin, 2008; Vis, 2012; Woodside, 2016).”
• Pictorial content, sequence of conflicting online reviews and consumer decision-making: The stimulus-organism-response model revisited (2020, methodology): “Data from the questionnaire were analyzed using fsQCA (Woodside, 2016).”