The formation and maintenance of crayfish hierarchies: behavioral and self-structuring properties

By Christoph Goessmann, Charlotte K. Hemelrijk, R. Huber. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2000

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d00ab5cf9958993edb469b88879c0127341fe0e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. R. Earley
2. Y. Hsu

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. R. Earley
2. Y. Hsu
3. Matthew J. Fuxjager
4. C. Marler

Citations in the corpus

• INDIVIDUAL AND STATUS RECOGNITION IN THE CRAYFISH, ORCONECTES RUSTICUS: THE EFFECTS OF URINE RELEASE ON FIGHT DYNAMICS (2001, unknown): “First, there are known winner and loser effects in organisms, in general, and craye sh more specie cally (Franck & Ribowski, 1987; Whitehouse, 1997; Hsu & Wolf, 1999; Goessmann et al., in press ).”
• Cannibalism of Decapod Crustaceans and Implications for Their Aquaculture: A Review of its Prevalence, Influencing Factors, and Mitigating Methods (2017, unknown): “This is likely due to the establishment of social hierarchies over time that tends to stabilize survival as observed with P. leniusculus, C. destructor, A. astacus, and P. clarkii (Jover et al., 1999; Goessmann et al., 2000; Ahvenharju and Ruohonen, 2007; Patullo et al., 2009).”
• Previous Experiences Alter the Outcome of Aggressive Interactions Between Males in the Crayfish, Procambarus Clarkii (2002, background): “Goessmann et al. (2000) similarly described separate timescales for the actions of ‘winner’ and ‘loser’ effects in crayfish.”
• Social relationships and reproductive state influence leadership roles in movements of plains zebra, Equus burchellii (2007, unknown): “We expect identity to have greater weight in group leadership for stable groups, because stability permits habitual leaderefollower relationships to develop (Goessmann et al. 2000; Chase et al. 2002; Beacham 2003).”
• Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes (2005, background): “The most intuitive design for experiments to examine how experience effects influence the dynamics of an intact group is to eliminate all possible confounding asymmetries (size, residency, age, sex, etc.) and examine how social interactions occur through time (e.g. Goessmann et al., 2000).”