Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar

By Jean-Pierre Koenig. 1996

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Grammar-Based Grounded Lexicon Learning (2022, background): “According to lexicalist linguistic theories [32, 39, 10], syntactic knowledge involves a small number of highly abstract and potentially universal combinatory rules, together with a large amount of learned information in the lexicon: a rich syntactic type and meaning representation for each word.”
NLTK: The Natural Language Toolkit (2002, background): “Infrastructure for grammar development has a long history in unification-based (or constraint-based) grammar frameworks, from DCG (Pereira and Warren, 1980) to HPSG (Pollard and Sag, 1994).”
Joint Video and Text Parsing for Understanding Events and Answering Queries (2013, methodology): “A head-driven phrase structure grammar (HPSG) [67] of English syntax is used to generate text sentences.”
Dissociations between Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations (2005, background): “In what are colloquially known as HPSG1 and HPSG2 (Pollard and Sag 1987, Pollard and Sag 1994: Ch.”
Determiner agreement and noun conjunction (2004, methodology): “…features, positing CONCORD and INDEX agreement features at the level of functional structure.2 Wechsler & Zlatić’s distinction between CONCORD and INDEX features follows work in HPSG by Pollard & Sag (1994), Kathol (1999), and others, which also makes a two-way distinction in agreement features.”
High-level event recognition in unconstrained videos (2012, methodology): “[167] explored a large image database with region-level annotations for image parsing and results are then converted to textual descriptions using a natural language generation (NLG) technique called head-driven phrase structure grammar [110].”
Computational and evolutionary aspects of language (2002, background): “Much of modern syntactic theory deals with such grammar”
Psycholinguistics, formal grammars, and cognitive science (2005, background): “…as “cognitive” (e.g., Taylor 2002) or that have been specifically designed to be representationally compatible with real-time processing algorithms (e.g., Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammars; Pollard and Sag 1994) have actually had much less impact on those who study comprehension and production.”
Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution (2002, background): “For instance, Figure 3 does not dictate whether the syntactic formation rules are along the lines of transformational grammar, the Minimalist Program, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, or many other alternatives.”
Structural priming: a critical review. (2008, background): “Note however that other theories do not assume multiple levels of constituent structure or the existence of some or all traces (eg, Bresnan & Kaplan, 1982; Gazdar, Klein, Pullum, & Sag, 1985; Pollard & Sag, 1994; Steedman, 2000).”
Convergent evidence for categorial change in French: From subject clitic to agreement marker (2010, background): “Chomsky 2000) or the hypothesis of STRONG LEXICAL INTEGRITY as in HPSG (”