Two life cycle assessment (LCA) based methods to analyse and design complex (regional) circular economy systems. Case: making water tourism more sustainable
By Arno Scheepens, J. Vogtländer, J. Brezet. 2016
331 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Marketing, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3cea13192be7660f1160d956178270e7674fff94
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- João C. O. Matias
- Marta Jacob
- Carlos Manuel Taboada Rodriguez
- Carmen Florido
- S. Walker
- Steven Sarasini
- Radu Godina
- Francesco Pomponi
In Marketing
- Mateusz Lewandowski
- N. Bech
- João C. O. Matias
- Marta Jacob
- Carlos Manuel Taboada Rodriguez
- Louise Laumann Kjaer
- Tim C. McAloone
- Carmen Florido
In Strategy and Management
- Mateusz Lewandowski
- N. Bech
- João C. O. Matias
- Marta Jacob
- Carlos Manuel Taboada Rodriguez
- Louise Laumann Kjaer
- Tim C. McAloone
- Carmen Florido
Citations in the corpus
- Proposal of a Sustainable Circular Index for Manufacturing Companies (2017, methodology): “[114] Applied the LCA Eco-cost and Value Ratio (EVR) model as a single indicator, integrating effectively the costs, eco-costs, and market value to assess the level of CE adoption in a regional water recreation park.”
- Designing the Business Models for Circular Economy—Towards the Conceptual Framework (2016, background): “[48] argue that transition to CE is impacted by different factors on several levels: societal, regulatory, services and infrastructure, and product and technology.”
- Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework (2017, background): “…1997; Van Berkel et al., 2009), whereas for the micro-level current research on the material dimension (Braungart et al., 2007; McDonough et al., 2003) and circular Supply Chain Management (SCM) (e.g. Lacy and Rutqvist, 2015; Singh and Ordoñez, 2016) could suffice to bring circularity about.”
- Product/Service‐Systems for a Circular Economy: The Route to Decoupling Economic Growth from Resource Consumption? (2019, positive): “Whereas rebound effects may be difficult to avoid completely, eco-efficient value creation (Scheepens et al. 2016) has been proposed as a mean to mitigate them.”
- Evaluating the Environmental Dimension of Material Efficiency Strategies Relating to the Circular Economy (2018, methodology): “The MCI and Eco-Costs tools are numerical calculation methods, with the former focussing on environmental circularity and the latter on economic circularity.”
- A Metric for Quantifying Product‐Level Circularity (2017, background): “Several metrics that may be applicable to product-level circularity are currently in circulation (see, e.g., C2C 2014; Gehin et al. 2008; Scheepens et al. 2016; Di Maio and Rem 2015).”