Binary neutron star mergers: Dependence on the nuclear equation of state

By K. Hotokezaka, K. Kyutoku, Hirotada Okawa, M. Shibata, Kentaro Kiuchi. 2011

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We perform a numerical-relativity simulation for the merger of binary neutron stars with 6 nuclear-theory-based equations of states (EOSs) described by piecewise polytropes. Our purpose is to explore the dependence of the dynamical behavior of the binary neutron star merger and resulting gravitational waveforms on the EOS of the supernuclear-density matter. The numerical results show that the merger process and the first outcome are classified into three types: (i) a black hole is promptly formed, (ii) a short-lived hypermassive neutron star (HMNS) is formed, (iii) a long-lived HMNS is formed. The type of the merger depends strongly on the EOS and on the total mass of the binaries. For the EOS with which the maximum mass is larger than $2{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$, the lifetime of the HMNS is longer than 10 ms for a total mass ${m}_{0}=2.7{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$. A recent radio observation suggests that the maximum mass of spherical neutron stars is ${M}_{\mathrm{max}}\ensuremath{\ge}1.97\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.04{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ in one $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ level. This fact and our results support the possible existence of a HMNS soon after the onset of the merger for a typical binary neutron star with ${m}_{0}=2.7{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$. We also show that the torus mass surrounding the remnant black hole is correlated with the type of the merger process; the torus mass could be large, $\ensuremath{\ge}0.1{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$, in the case that a long-lived HMNS is formed. We also show that gravitational waves carry information of the merger process, the remnant, and the torus mass surrounding a black hole.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ccad0223360ef0f7521cf095bec947cac4306fa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. B. Metzger
  2. David Radice
  3. Albino Perego
  4. R. Fern'andez
  5. Oleg Korobkin
  6. Stephan Rosswog
  7. Luke F. Roberts
  8. A. Arcones

In Geophysics

  1. B. Metzger
  2. T. Totani
  3. Hans-Thomas Janka
  4. R. Fern'andez
  5. Luke F. Roberts
  6. Albino Perego
  7. David Radice
  8. Christian D. Ott

Citations in the corpus