The relationship between invader abundance and impact

By H. Sofaer, Catherine S. Jarnevich, I. Pearse. Ecosphere, 2018

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The impacts of invasive species generally increase with their abundance, but the form of invader abundance–impact relationships remain poorly described. We highlight the utility of abundance–impact curves for three questions. First, abundance–impact relationships can clarify whether prevention and management should focus on the species likely to become abundant or those likely to cause large impacts per individual. Second, comparing abundance–impact relationships between native and exotic species can reveal any systematic differences in their effects on ecological systems. Third, identifying any thresholds in the relationship between invader impact and abundance can be used to select management targets and design invasive species control strategies. With increasing extent and resolution of datasets of invasive organisms worldwide, we now have the opportunity to explore in detail the form and context dependence of the abundance–impact relationship. Doing so provides opportunities to improve the prediction of invader impact, to better understand the differences between exotic and resident organisms, and to scale the impacts of invasive species from localities to ranges.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/66266e5a6c87b986daccb8753f3ce8d32d02f902

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

  1. Petr Pyšek
  2. D. Richardson
  3. Jonathan M. Jeschke
  4. M. Vilà
  5. A. Ricciardi
  6. Daniel Simberloff
  7. P. Hulme
  8. Jane A. Catford

In Ecology

  1. Petr Pyšek
  2. D. Richardson
  3. Jonathan M. Jeschke
  4. P. Hulme
  5. H. MacIsaac
  6. Daniel Simberloff
  7. M. Vilà
  8. A. Ricciardi

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. Petr Pyšek
  2. D. Richardson
  3. Jonathan M. Jeschke
  4. P. Hulme
  5. M. Vilà
  6. H. MacIsaac
  7. Daniel Simberloff
  8. Jane A. Catford

Citations in the corpus