Past, present and future of spike sorting techniques
By H. Rey, Carlos Pedreira, R. Quian Quiroga. Brain Research Bulletin, 2015
446 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Spike sorting is a crucial step to extract information from extracellular recordings. With new recording opportunities provided by the development of new electrodes that allow monitoring hundreds of neurons simultaneously, the scenario for the new generation of algorithms is both exciting and challenging. However, this will require a new approach to the problem and the development of a common reference framework to quickly assess the performance of new algorithms. In this work, we review the basic concepts of spike sorting, including the requirements for different applications, together with the problems faced by presently available algorithms. We conclude by proposing a roadmap stressing the crucial points to be addressed to support the neuroscientific research of the near future.
Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f032f145f06ffef9e60833e4f85700fb8a98a1d0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Steffen B. E. Wolff
- Valentin A. Normand
- Ashesh K. Dhawale
- Evi Kopelowitz
- Rajesh Poddar
- Bence Olveczky
- Matthias H Hennig
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Steffen B. E. Wolff
- Valentin A. Normand
- Ashesh K. Dhawale
- Evi Kopelowitz
- Rajesh Poddar
- Bence Olveczky
- Matthias H Hennig
Citations in the corpus
- SpikeInterface, a unified framework for spike sorting (2019, methodology): “To alleviate this issue, spike sorting has seen decades of algorithmic and software improvements to increase both the accuracy and automation of the process [62].”
- Automated long-term recording and analysis of neural activity in behaving animals (2016, methodology): “These face three major challenges (Rey et al., 2015): First, they must reliably capture the activity of simultaneously recorded neurons whose firing rates can vary over many orders of magnitude (Hromádka et al., 2008; Mizuseki and Buzsáki, 2013).”