Good Semi-supervised Learning That Requires a Bad GAN

By Zihang Dai, Zhilin Yang, Fan Yang, William W. Cohen, Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2017

507 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Semi-supervised learning methods based on generative adversarial networks (GANs) obtained strong empirical results, but it is not clear 1) how the discriminator benefits from joint training with a generator, and 2) why good semi-supervised classification performance and a good generator cannot be obtained at the same time. Theoretically, we show that given the discriminator objective, good semisupervised learning indeed requires a bad generator, and propose the definition of a preferred generator. Empirically, we derive a novel formulation based on our analysis that substantially improves over feature matching GANs, obtaining state-of-the-art results on multiple benchmark datasets.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Generative Models

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Yoshua Bengio
  2. Quoc V. Le
  3. Sergey Levine
  4. Dacheng Tao
  5. Mohit Bansal
  6. Trevor Darrell
  7. Ruslan Salakhutdinov
  8. Bernt Schiele

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Dacheng Tao
  3. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  4. Xiaogang Wang
  5. Trevor Darrell
  6. Alan L. Yuille
  7. Bernt Schiele
  8. Andrea Vedaldi

In Generative Models

  1. Stefano Ermon
  2. Yoshua Bengio
  3. Aaron C. Courville
  4. Yang Song
  5. Diederik P. Kingma
  6. Arash Vahdat
  7. Jiaming Song
  8. Jonathan Ho

Citations in the corpus