Geoengineering and Climate Change Polarization: Testing a Two-channel Model of Science Communication

By Dan Kahan, H. Jenkins‐Smith, Tor Tarantola, Carol L. Silva, Donald Braman. 2015

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does Engagement in Advocacy Hurt the Credibility of Scientists? Results from a Randomized National Survey Experiment (2017, background): “…change in the context of climate change in response to a variety of messages and formats, across political orientations (e.g. Feldman & Hart, 2016; Kahan et al., 2015; Lewandowsky, Gignac, & Vaughan, 2013; Nisbet, Hart, Myers, & Ellithorpe, 2013; van der Linden, Leiserowitz, Feinberg, & Maibach,…”
Towards a cultural political economy of mitigation deterrence by negative emissions technologies (NETs) (2018, background): “Cultural cognition approaches suggest that individual reasoning on issues like climate change is distorted in line with cultural identities, in ways that could make climate denialists particularly susceptible to the attractions of geoengineering as an alternative to mitigation [17,37,40].”