Review of approaches to evaluate the effectiveness of weed biological control agents

By L. Morin, A. M. Reid, N. Sims-Chilton, Y. Buckley, K. Dhileepan, G. Hastwell, T. Nordblom, S. Raghu. 2009

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c1ab03c1540d749aa2a613272b98e9ab125222e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

1. H. Müller-Schärer
2. Suzanne T. E. Lommen
3. R. Shaw
4. D. Wright
5. Urs Schaffner
6. Rieks D. van Klinken
7. Owain Edwards

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. G. Clewley
2. H. Müller-Schärer
3. R. Shaw
4. D. Wright
5. R. Eschen
6. Urs Schaffner

In Plant Science

1. H. Müller-Schärer
2. Urs Schaffner
3. Rieks D. van Klinken
4. Owain Edwards

Citations in the corpus

• The effectiveness of classical biological control of invasive plants (2012, background): “Recently, the importance of studying post-control changes in the plant and invertebrate community has been discussed and components of effective study designs, such as control sites where no biological control agents are released, have been suggested (Blossey & Skinner 2000; Carson et al. 2008; Mori”
• Ophraella communa, the ragweed leaf beetle, has successfully landed in Europe: fortunate coincidence or threat? (2014, background): “A population dynamics modelling approach will be useful to predict the potential impact on A. artemisiifolia in the long term (Morin et al., 2009) and to assess whether an equilibrium of low levels of A. artemisiifolia and biological control agent densities can be maintained (Buckley et al., 2005).”