One-sided Logic in Two-sided Markets

By Julian Wright. 2004

318 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Media Technology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c10a9ffdf614fad36909c97c06855df6d9eee7c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Media Technology

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Passions and the Interests: Unpacking the 'Sharing Economy' (2016, background): “xli The practical relevance of the two-sided market literature has mostly to do with competition policy implications (see for instance Evans, 2003; Wright, 2004).”
The evolution of airport ownership and governance (2011, background): “38 I borrow this expression from Wright (2004). 6.”
A Price Theory of Multi-Sided Platforms (2010, methodology): “Thus the RT2006 model takes a “macro” approach, in the terminology of Nicholas Economides (1996).”
Competition and antitrust in internet markets (2016, background): “Hence, high concentration levels cannot simply be interpreted in the same manner as in conventional markets without network effects (see, e.g., Wright, 2004; Evans and 5 Schmalensee, 2013).”
Network neutrality on the Internet: A two-sided market analysis (2012, unknown): “This echoes earlier theoretical evidence suggesting that introducing competition in a two-sided market does not necessarily lead to a pricing structure that is closer to the socially optimal one (see, for example, Wright (2004), Armstrong (2006) or Hagiu (2007)).”
On File Sharing With Indirect Network Effects Between Concert Ticket Sales and Music Recordings (2012, background): “This result contrasts with other models of two-sided markets or complementary products where usually the price for one good or service is lower while the prices for the other product or service increases when compared to a reference model without complementarities or indirect network effects (Wright”
Two-Sided Markets: A Tentative Survey (2005, background): “The difficulties associated with the application of conventional guidelines for antitrust policy is briefly considered in the fifth section, based on Evans (2003) and Wright (2003c).”
Google, Facebook, Amazon, eBay: Is the Internet driving competition or market monopolization? (2014, background): “Another notable point is that usually one side of the market is “subsidized” by the other (Wright 2004; Parker and van Alstyne 2005).”
Tying in Two-Sided Markets with Multi-Homing (2010, unknown): “Evans (2003) and Wright (2003), for instance, provide a general discussion on antitrust policy in two-sided markets and call for caution in applying the traditional one-sided logic to two-sided markets in the antitrust arena.”
Scoping the Sharing Economy: Origins, Definitions, Impact and Regulatory Issues (2016, methodology): “…in fact, has to do with competition policy implications that have been addressed by several authors (Evans, 2003a; Evans & Noel, 2005; Evans & Schmalensee, 2007; Wright, 2004); some economic principles routinely used in competition policy do not hold when markets are two-sided or multi-sided.”
The Future of Work in the ‘Sharing Economy’. Market Efficiency and Equitable Opportunities or Unfair Precarisation? (2016, unknown): “In their approach to two-sided markets (2SMs) and multi-sided platforms Hagiu & Wright (2013; 2015a; 2015b, 2015c) contrast them to Vertical Integrated (VI) firms or resellers alongside the dimension of the amount of control exerted.”