Theta oscillation coupled spike latencies yield computational vigour in a mammalian sensory system

By Troy W. Margrie, Andreas T. Schaefer. 2003

296 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

1. Shawn D. Burton
2. Niko A. Busch
3. J. Dubois
4. R. VanRullen
5. C. Poo
6. Jeffery S. Isaacson

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Niko A. Busch
2. J. Dubois
3. R. VanRullen
4. Shawn D. Burton
5. C. Poo
6. Jeffery S. Isaacson
7. Pascal Fries
8. Ole Jensen

In Sensory Systems

1. Shawn D. Burton
2. R. VanRullen
3. C. Poo
4. Jeffery S. Isaacson
5. Pascal Fries
6. Ole Jensen
7. John E. Lisman

Citations in the corpus

• Inhibitory circuits of the mammalian main olfactory bulb. (2017, background): “Sensory input to the MOB evokes long-latency and sparse GC firing both in vivo (Cang and Isaacson 2003; Fukunaga et al. 2014; Labarrera et al. 2013; Luo and Katz 2001; Margrie and Schaefer 2003; Wellis and Scott 1990) and in vitro (Burton and Urban 2015).”
• Odor representations in olfactory cortex: "sparse" coding, global inhibition, and oscillations. (2009, background): “In the mammalian olfactory system, respiratory modulation is a prominent feature governing the time course of odor-evoked activity (Cang and Isaacson, 2003; Litaudon et al., 2003; Margrie and Schaefer, 2003; Only the soma and dendritic arbors are shown in reconstruction.”
• Odor representations in olfactory cortex: distributed rate coding and decorrelated population activity (2012, unknown): “…cells, the exclusive outputs of the olfactory bulb (Cang and Isaacson, 2003; Friedrich and Laurent, 2001; Hamilton and Kauer, 1989; Junek et al., 2010; Macrides and Chorover, 1972; Margrie and Schaefer, 2003; Meredith, 1986; Spors and Grinvald, 2002; Wehr and Laurent, 1996; Wellis et al., 1989).”
• The Phase of Ongoing EEG Oscillations Predicts Visual Perception (2009, background): “…is converted into a phase code: the stronger the feature value, the earlier the corresponding units will respond within a given oscillation cycle (O’Keefe and Recce, 1993; Hopfield, 1995; Mehta et al., 2002; Margrie and Schaefer, 2003; Buzsáki and Draguhn, 2004; Lisman, 2005; Fries et al., 2007).”
• Spike-phase coding boosts and stabilizes information carried by spatial and temporal spike patterns. (2009, unknown): “In addition, combined modeling and experimental work has demonstrated that rhythmic input increases the firing precision of single neurons and increases their robustness to noise (Brody and Hopfield, 2003; Margrie and Schaefer, 2003; Schaefer et al., 2006; Tiesinga et al., 2002).”
• Independent control of gamma and theta activity by distinct interneuron networks in the olfactory bulb (2014, unknown): “Other JGCs showed no detectable alteration to spontaneous activity upon silencing M/TCs, demonstrating the dominant source of their excitatory drive to be other than OB projection neurons (Fig.”