Carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon‐DNA adducts and mechanism of action
By William M. Baird, L. Hooven, B. Mahadevan. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 2005
666 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cancer Research, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c046702a75fe72eee2e06212dd5496ea84d0a7b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- N. Agerbirk
- M. Vos
- J. H. Kim
- Georg Jander
- B. Delage
- R. Dashwood
- David E. Williams
- J. Higdon
Citations in the corpus
- Cruciferous vegetables and human cancer risk: epidemiologic evidence and mechanistic basis. (2007, background): “However, there is a potential for adverse effects, because some procarcinogens require biotransformation by phase I enzymes to become active carcinogens [84].”
- Indole glucosinolate breakdown and its biological effects (2008, background): “This negative effect seems to also result from the induction of phase 1 enzymes, due to their potential of oxidizing inert polyaromatic hydrocarbons into DNA-binding products ( Baird et al. 2005, Fig. 8).”