A double-moment parameterization for simulating autoconversion, accretion and selfcollection

By A. Seifert, Klaus D. Beheng. 2001

455 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3bd3bb4376bbfcc62bd2d4c71e2fbef95f701116

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

On the Factors Modulating the Stratocumulus to Cumulus Transitions (2011, unknown): “Cloud microphysical processes are treated with a two-moment bulk microphysical scheme (Seifert and Beheng 2001), which includes droplet autoconversion, accretion, drizzle, and cloud droplet sedimentation and evaporation.”
Dynamical downscaling of CMIP5 global circulation models over CORDEX-Africa with COSMO-CLM: evaluation over the present climate and analysis of the added value (2015, background): “…closure at level 2.5 according to Mellor and Yamada (1982); a one-moment cloud microphysics scheme, a reduced version of the parameterization of Seifert and Beheng (2001); a multi layer soil model (Schrodin and Heise 2001, 2002; Heise et al. 2003); subgrid scale orography processes (Schulz…”
Operational Convective-Scale Numerical Weather Prediction with the COSMO Model: Description and Sensitivities (2011, unknown): “…the COSMO model have also been updated recently [e.g., the Kessler-type autoconversion–accretion scheme has been replaced by the parameterization of Seifert and Beheng (2001), which is reduced to a one-moment scheme by assuming a constant cloud droplet number concentration of N c 5 5 3 10 8 m 2 3…”
Impact of Cloud Microphysics on the Development of Trailing Stratiform Precipitation in a Simulated Squall Line: Comparison of One- and Two-Moment Schemes (2009, background): “Several two-moment schemes have been developed and utilized in a variety of applications (e.g., Koenig and Murray 1976; Ferrier 1994; Meyers et al. 1997; Khairoutdinov and Kogan 2000; Seifert and Beheng 2001; Milbrandt and Yau 2005; Morrison et al. (2005, hereafter MCK).”
A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: Description and numerical tests (2008, methodology): “Two-moment schemes have been used fairly extensively in cloud-resolving and mesoscale models (e.g., Ferrier 1994; Meyers et al. 1997; Khairoutidnov and Kogan 2000; Seifert and Beheng 2001; Morrison and Pinto 2005; Milbrandt and Yau 2005; Morrison and Grabowski 2007; Phillips et al. 2007).”
Large-Eddy Simulations of a Drizzling, Stratocumulus-Topped Marine Boundary Layer (2009, methodology): “The microphysics scheme carries qr and Nr as prognostic variables; qc is diagnosed as the positive definite residual between equilibrium ql and prognostic qr. Microphysics follows two prescriptions, one KK00 and the other Seifert and Beheng (2001, 2006); denoted respectively as UCLA and UCLA_SB.”
A Novel Approach for Representing Ice Microphysics in Models: Description and Tests Using a Kinematic Framework (2007, background): “More detailed two-moment schemes were subsequently developed that predict both mixing ratio and number concentration of cloud droplets and drizzle/rain (e.g., Khairoutdinov and Kogan 2000; Seifert and Beheng 2001; Saleeby and Cotton 2004; Morrison et al. 2005).”
The Non-hydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model: description and development (2014, methodology): “The double-moment bulk method enables us to explicitly evaluate the dependence of the collisional growth rate on the mode radii (Berry and Reinhardt 1974; Feingold et al. 1998; Khairoutdinov and Kogan 2000; Seifert and Beheng 2001).”
Overview of the PALM model system 6.0 (2019, methodology): “and its implementation we refer to Steinfeld et al. (2008) and Maronga et al.”
Parameterization of Cloud Microphysics Based on the Prediction of Bulk Ice Particle Properties. Part I: Scheme Description and Idealized Tests (2015, methodology): “The horizontal grid spacing is 1 km, with 80 vertical levels between the surface and model top. The time step is 5 s and the domain size is 500 km in the horizontal and 20 km in the vertical. Lateral boundary conditions are open. Radar reflectivity is calculated assuming Rayleigh scattering followin”
Understanding macrophysical outcomes of microphysical choices in simulations of shallow cumulus convection (2008, background): “…the gap between the proliferation of papers devoted to the development of simplified models (Feingold et al. 1994; Khairoutdinov and Kogan 2000; Seifert and Beheng 2001; Morrisson and Grabowski 2007, among others), and the use of large-eddy simulation to study aerosol-cloud interactions from…”
Impacts of cloud microphysics on trade wind cumulus: which cloud microphysics processes contribute to the diversity in a large eddy simulation? (2015, methodology): “The one-moment bulk scheme and the two-moment bulk scheme are based on Berry (1968) and Seifert and Beheng (2001), respectively.”
Confronting the Challenge of Modeling Cloud and Precipitation Microphysics (2020, unknown): “…category, typically number and mass mixing ratios (e.g., Chen & Liu, 2004; Cohard & Pinty, 2000; Ferrier, 1994; Koenig & Murray, 1976; Lim & Hong, 2010; Meyers et al., 1997; Milbrandt & Yau, 2005a; Morrison et al., 2005; Seifert & Beheng, 2001, 2006; Thompson & Eidhammer, 2014; Ziegler, 1985).”
Modeling Supersaturation and Subgrid-Scale Mixing with Two-Moment Bulk Warm Microphysics (2008, background): “…and number concentrations of cloud droplets and drizzle/raindrops; e.g., Ziegler (1985); Cohard and Pinty (2000); Khairoutdinov and Kogan (2000); Seifert and Beheng (2001); Morrison et al. (2005)] to complicated and computationally demanding detailed (bin) microphysics schemes (e.g., Feingold…”