Animal Communication Networks: Public, private or anonymous? Facilitating and countering eavesdropping

By Torben Dabelsteen. 2005

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Law, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3bc939a5bfcb0c55003bdf6e519bcb822ac0071e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Daniel T. Blumstein
2. J. E. Elie

Citations in the corpus

• Vocal communication at the nest between mates in wild zebra finches: a private vocal duet? (2010, background): “Duets in this species may be of low intensity because of the possibly conflicting interests in the communication network: quiet duets allow communication between mates while limiting eavesdropping by conspecifics (Dabelsteen 2005).”
• Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus (2011, background): “Blackbirds use more directional vocalizations in social contexts where eavesdropping may be costly (Dabelsteen 2005), such as pre-copulatory calls, and less directional vocalizations when broadcasting alarm calls to neighbours and mates.”