Examining the impacts of socioeconomic factors, urban form, and transportation networks on CO2 emissions in China’s megacities

396 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Place value: place quality and its impact on health, social, economic and environmental outcomes (2018, background): “(2010) Carbon reducing technologies and urban form Technological interventions, land uses and density integrating technological interventions in medium scale development reduces greenhouse gas emissions most significantly Wang et al. (2017) Co2 emissions in megacities urban structure, public transpo”
Future energy use and CO2 emissions of urban passenger transport in China: A travel behavior and urban form based approach (2018, methodology): “Whereas, Wang, Liu [16] found in Beijing (2000–2012) that increased vehicle-use intensity was one of the main driving forces behind CO2 emissions and promoting individual travel behavioral change played an important role in mitigating urban transport emissions.”
Household time use, carbon footprints, and urban form: a review of the potential contributions of everyday living to the 1.5 °C climate target (2018, background): “For example, apartment buildings in cities offer comparative low-carbon advantages due to less living space per capita requiring heating/cooling, additionally they often have better thermal insulation than single family houses [9,10,39 ,46,58,59].”