Camera trapping for jaguar (Panthera onca) in the Tuichi Valley, Bolivia

By R. Wallace, Humberto Gómez, G. Ayala, F. Espinoza. 2003

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b4b2a87855cfbda4765b186868c91d6080f3333

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Mathias Tobler
2. M. Kelly
3. R. Foster
4. R. Sollmann
5. G. Powell
6. A. Noss
7. B. Harmsen
8. Beth Gardner

Citations in the corpus

• Density, habitat use and activity patterns of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) in the Atlantic Forest of Misiones, Argentina (2006, background): “…with success to study population densities of wild cats: tigers Panthera tigris (Karanth, 1995; Karanth & Nichols, 1998; Carbone et al., 2001), jaguars P. onca (Wallace et al., 2003; Maffei, Cuéllar & Noss, 2004; Silver et al., 2004) and ocelots (Trolle & Kéry, 2003, 2005; Maffei et al., 2005).”
• Modelling potential dispersal corridors for cougars in midwestern North America using least-cost path methods (2008, methodology): “…method for monitoring cougar presence as these methods have been effective for monitoring other large, elusive felids such as jaguars (Panther onca; Wallace et al., 2003; Silver et al., 2004) and tigers (Panthera tigris; Karanth, 1995; Karanth and Nichols, 1998) that typically occur at low…”
• Jaguar Panthera onca population decline in the Upper Paraná Atlantic Forest of Argentina and Brazil (2008, methodology): “…estimate jaguar densities we used a standard cameratrapping protocol (Karanth, 1995; Karanth & Nichols, 1998) that has been used to estimate jaguar densities (Wallace et al., 2003; Maffei et al., 2004; Silver et al., 2004; Cullen et al., 2005; Soisalo & Cavalcanti, 2006; Salom-Pérez et al., 2007).”
• A critique of density estimation from camera-trap data† (2012, methodology): “Wallace et al. (2003) used the most conservative estimate of jaguar home range available in the literature (female: 10 km2) to estimate ETA for both sexes, an approach that will most likely overestimate the true jaguar density.”
• Estimating the density of a jaguar population in the Brazilian Pantanal using camera-traps and capture–recapture sampling in combination with GPS radio-telemetry (2006, methodology): “Although extensively used to estimate tiger populations (Karanth, 1995; Karanth and Nichols, 1998, 2000; Franklin et al., 1999; Smith et al., 1999; Karanth et al., 2001; O’Brien et al., 2003; Kawanishi and Sunquist, 2004), the use of camera-traps in combination with capture–recapture sampling method”
• Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture-recapture models. (2009, methodology): “Such surveys have been conducted for tigers (Karanth and Nichols 1998, Karanth et al. 2004), leopards (Henschel and Ray 2003), jaguars (Wallace et al. 2003, Maffei et al. 2004, Soisalo and Cavalcanti 2006), and ocelots (Trolle and Kéry 2003), for example.”
• High jaguar densities and large population sizes in the core habitat of the southwestern Amazon (2013, background): “Wallace et al. (2003) speculated that the low density of jaguars in the Tuichi Valley could be related to extensive hunting for skins in the 1970s and 1980s or to a relatively low abundance of prey species caused by hunting between 1987 and 1995.”
• Design, evaluate, refine: camera trap studies for elusive species (2008, background): “The number of camera stations deployed for a target species can range, for example, from 17 (Kelly, 2003) to 32 (Wallace et al., 2003), and the extent of area surveyed can differ by orders of magnitude (DiBitetti, Paviolo & De Angelo, 2006; Maffei & Noss, 2007).”
• Improving density estimates for elusive carnivores: Accounting for sex-specific detection and movements using spatial capture–recapture models for jaguars in central Brazil (2011, methodology): “Other approaches have been used to estimate buffer width, for example the full MMDM (twice the MMDM–fMMDM), or the radius of an average home range, both based on telemetry data (Soisalo and Cavalcanti, 2006) and on information from the literature (Wallace et al., 2003).”
• Estimating jaguar densities with camera traps: Problems with current designs and recommendations for future studies (2013, unknown): “…(Silver et al. 2004) Bolivia Rios Tuichi and Hondo, Madidi 45 30 54 - 1.6 127 - (Wallace et al. 2003) Bolivia Rios Tuichi and Hondo, Madidi 32 29 77 - - 170 1.68±0.78 (Wallace et al. 2003) Bolivia San Miguelito 28 60 1.5 24 5 6±1.54 2.8 54 11 (Rumiz et al. 2003) Bolivia San Miguelito 25 60 1.5…”
• An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large‐ and medium‐sized terrestrial rainforest mammals (2008, background): “Camera traps are still most frequently used in surveys to estimate the abundance of large cats (Wallace et al., 2003; Silver et al., 2004; Di Bitetti, Paviolo & De Angelo, 2006; Jackson et al., 2006; Karanth et al., 2006).”
• Estimating Puma Densities from Camera Trapping across Three Study Sites: Bolivia, Argentina, and Belize (2008, background): “…from https://academ ic.oup.com /jm am m al/article-abstract/89/2/408/930235 by guest on 30 O ctober 2018 2003; Maffei et al. 2004; Silver et al. 2004; Wallace et al. 2003), ocelots (Leopardus pardalis—Di Bitetti et al. 2006; Dillon and Kelly 2007; Maffei et al. 2005; Trolle and Kery 2003), and…”