Dispersal behaviour of individuals in metapopulations of two British butterflies

By L. Conradt, T. Roper, Christopher M Thomas. 2001

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b35d31718b6a6200d5d455e5ee3df6772167c69

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. M. Baguette
2. Josef Settele
3. J. Dover
4. J. Chardon
5. D. Bowler
6. W. Piper
7. E. Matthysen
8. F. Adriaensen

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. H. Van Dyck
2. Josef Settele
3. J. Dover
4. M. Baguette
5. Lia Hemerik
6. D. Bowler
7. W. Piper
8. E. Matthysen

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. H. Van Dyck
2. M. Baguette
3. Josef Settele
4. J. Dover
5. F. Adriaensen
6. E. Matthysen
7. T. Benton
8. D. Bowler

Citations in the corpus

• Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure: a case study for the Speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.) (2003, background): “…birds: e.g. Cassady St. Clair et al. 1998; Brooker et al. 1999; amphibians: Vos et al. submitted; carabids: e.g. Vermeulen 1995; Tischendorf et al. 1998; butterflies: e.g. Haddad 1999; Conradt et al. 2000; Conradt et al. 2001; Dover and Fry 2001; Ricketts 2001; Ries and Debinski 2001; Roland at al.”
• The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review (2009, background): “Conradt et al. (2000, 2001) have demonstrated that at least some butterflies (Maniola jurtina and Pyronia tithonus) have ‘non-random’ dispersal strategies, can recognise habitat from a distance of 100–150 m away, and preferentially return to known habitat patches.”
• Effect of local weather on butterfly flight behaviour, movement, and colonization: significance for dispersal under climate change (2011, background): “The release site was located at a distance of approximately 2000 m from the catching site, which is much further than the perceptual range of individuals (100–150 m according to Conradt et al. (2001)).”
• Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: Routine or special movements? (2005, background): “Conradt, Bodsworth, Roper, and Thomas (2000) and Conradt, Roper, and Thomas (2001) studied movements by experimental releases of butterflies outside their habitat.”
• Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics (2005, background): “…armatus, has been shown to be able to detect a food source (fungus) at 40 cm (Bengtsson et al., 1994) and the gatekeeper butterfly at 85 m (Conradt et al., 2001) but a lack of orientation towards host plants was reported for goldenrod beetles, Trihabda borealis (Goodwin & Fahrig, 2002a)…”
• Making habitat selection more “familiar”: a review (2011, background): “from site familiarity (Grange 1932; Nice 1941; Tinbergen 1953; Baker 1978; Waser and Wiley 1980; Greenwood and Harvey 1982; Part 1994; Conradt et al. 2001; Shanks 2002; Harwood et al. 2003).”