Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method
By J. Gubrium, James A. Holstein. 2001
1,170 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ada8f6bcf6a6fae7a5ef9f22b31d1a17d2a0f2d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Michelle N. Lafrance
- Suzanne McKenzie-Mohr
- Dulini Fernando
- Ajnesh Prasad
- D. Polkinghorne
- Peter Mcilveen
- Phillip L. Hammack
- J. Ponterotto
Citations in the corpus
- Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. (2005, background): “Although research interviews are sometimes conducted with groups (eg, focus groups; Morgan, 1988, 2002), most qualitative interviews are one-to-one or dyadic interviews.”
- E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion (2006, unknown): “Over the years, however, researchers have identified challenges associated with the observation and in-depth interview methods, including cost, time, and limited access to research participants (Denzin & Lincoln, 2005; Gubrium & Holstein, 2002; Kvale, 1996; Miles & Huberman, 1994; Patton, 2002; St”
- Telling stories without the words: ‘Tightrope talk’ in women’s accounts of coming to live well after rape or depression (2011, methodology): “Data analysis process and procedures, as outlined by Charmaz (2002, 2006), were followed in the analysis of participant interviews for this study.”
- Sex-based harassment and organizational silencing: How women are led to reluctant acquiescence in academia (2018, result): “Contrary to what we expected, and what the literature suggests about collecting qualitative interview data on sensitive topics (Adler and Adler, 2002; Dundon and Ryan, 2009), our research participants were willing to share their views and experiences freely.”