Bayesian analyses : where to start and what to report

By R. van de Schoot, S. Depaoli. 2014

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3aca57e0b0aae836c685e668d3a6c2c895147809

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Yue Xiao
2. Hongyun Liu
3. K. Hau
4. Herbert W. Marsh
5. Alexandre J. S. Morin
6. Ulrich Trautwein
7. Eldad Davidov
8. Andrew J. Martin

Citations in the corpus

• Improving Transparency and Replication in Bayesian Statistics: The WAMBS-Checklist (2017, unknown): “…novice reader to, among many others: Bolstad (2007); Carlin and Louis (2009); Christensen, Johnson, Branscum, and Hanson (2010); Depaoli and Boyajian, (2014); Gelman and Hill (2007); Kaplan, 2014; Kruschke (2010); Jackman (2009); Lynch (2007); Ntzoufras (2009); or van de Schoot and Depaoli (2014).”
• A Comparison of CFA, ESEM, and BSEM in Test Structure Analysis (2019, background): “As priors bring information into the analyses, improper priors may have different aversive effects on the estimates (e.g. Seaman, Seaman, & Stamey, 2012; van de Schoot & Depaoli, 2014; van Erp, Mulder, & Oberski, 2018).”