Multiple Comparison Procedures

By Y. Hochberg, Ajit C. Tamhane. 2009

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ac38dc89081f634693e9485a28ff20dda8c7dd0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Bernhard Schölkopf
2. Jan Peters
3. Yoshua Bengio
4. Achim Zeileis
5. Sergey Levine
6. Susan Athey
7. Peter Buhlmann
8. Torsten Hothorn

Citations in the corpus

• Closing the sensorimotor loop: haptic feedback facilitates decoding of motor imagery (2011, methodology): “[32] Y.”
• PROPERTIES OF HIGHER CRITICISM UNDER STRONG DEPENDENCE (2008, methodology): “Review-type accounts of multiple hypothesis testing include those of Hochberg and Tamhane [13], Pigeot [25], Dudoit, Shaffer and Boldrich [9], Bernhard, Klein and Hommel [3] and Lehmann and Romano ([23], Chapter 9).”
• Model-Based Recursive Partitioning (2008, methodology): “Across nodes, significance is controlled by an approach corresponding to closed testing procedures for multiple comparisons (Marcus, Peritz, and Gabriel 1976; Hochberg and Tamhane 1987): because the hypotheses in a tree are recursively nested, significance of p values is only interpretable if parame”