Mathematical Basis and Validation of the Full Cavitation Model
By A. Singhal, M. Athavale, Huiying Li, Yu Jiang. 2002
1,681 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ac1f18e07ae6e417ae6471d559fdfd6b9153353
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
- Eric Goncalvès
- Regiane Fortes Patella
- Wei Shyy
- Inanc Senocak
- Manolis Gavaises
- B. Ji
- C. Arcoumanis
- K. Breuer
In Materials Chemistry
- M. Dular
- Eric Goncalvès
- Wei Shyy
- Inanc Senocak
- Regiane Fortes Patella
- Manolis Gavaises
- Baoling Huang
- C. Arcoumanis
In Mechanics of Materials
Citations in the corpus
- Numerical simulation of cavitating flows with homogeneous models (2009, methodology): “For cavitating applications, density variations have to be included; see the following papers with SIMPLE or PISO pressure-based algorithms [9,14,43,45,54,57].”
- Experimental evaluation of numerical simulation of cavitating flow around hydrofoil (2005, background): “Keywords:Cavitation; Single hydrofoil; Visualization; PIV-LIV method; CFD”
- Analysis of cavitating flow structure by experimental and numerical investigations (2007, methodology): “…convection/production of vapour (Merkle et al. 1998; Kunz et al. 2000), or by the evolution of a cluster of bubbles according to a simplified Reyleigh–Plesset equation (Kubota et al. 1992; Singhal et al. 2002), or by a barotropicstate law derived from the model proposed by Delannoy & Kueny (1990).”
- Interfacial dynamics‐based modelling of turbulent cavitating flows, Part‐1: Model development and steady‐state computations (2004, methodology): “The interface is captured more sharply with the new interfacial dynamics model, Model-2 [5] and Model-3 [ 23 ] than with Model-1 [3, 22], especially in the downstream region of the cavity.”
- Modelling of cavitation in diesel injector nozzles (2008, positive): “Another bubble-based model is that of Singhal et al. (2001, 2002), in which a mixture formulation was also followed, combined with the Rayleigh equation for vapour mass production/destruction.”
- Numerical analysis of unsteady cavitating turbulent flow and shedding horse-shoe vortex structure around a twisted hydrofoil (2013, background): “The source term for the specific interphase mass transfer rate can be modeled by various cavitation models (Kunz et al., 2000; Schnerr and Sauer, 2001; Senocak and Shyy, 2004a; Singhal et al., 2002; Zwart et al., 2004).”
- Numerical and Experimental Investigations of the Cavitating Behavior of an Inducer (2004, background): “…in the development of non-equilibrium heat/mass/momentum exchange terms between the phases In either category, the emphasis is on solving the mass, momentum and sometimes energy transport, in a continuous fashion, over the non-cavitating and cavitating regions of the flow (Tremante et al., 2002).”
- Vortex flow and cavitation in diesel injector nozzles (2008, methodology): “…allow the formation and development of cavitation inside the nozzle to be simulated (Kubota, Kato & Yamaguchi 1992; Avva, Singhal & Gibson 1995; Schmidt, Rutland & Corradini 1997; Alajbegovic, Grogger & Philipp 1999; Marcer et al. 2000; Sauer, Winkler & Schnerr 2000; Singhal et al. 2001, 2002).”
- Combined Experimental and Computational Investigation of Unsteady Structure of Sheet/Cloud Cavitation (2013, background): “Most numerical models of cavitating flow assume the fluid to be homogeneous and isothermal, and apply either a barotropic equation of state [14,15] or a transport equation [16–20] to solve for the variation of the mixture density in the multiphase flow.”