THE MISMATCH BETWEEN INCOME MEASURES AND DIRECT OUTCOME MEASURES OF POVERTY

By B. Perry. 2002

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3abcd656556666077625177d76a27c6571c8a5dc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Income poverty and material hardship: How strong is the association? (2007, background): “Material hardship is only moderately correlated with income and poverty in the U.S. (Mayer and Jencks, 1989, 1993; Mayer, 1995; Rector et al., 1999; Beverly, 2000; Boushey et al., 2001; Perry, 2002; Bradshaw and Finch, 2003).”
Overlaps in Dimensions of Poverty (2003, methodology): “Following Townsend’s (1979) the use of indicators of deprivation began to emerge and were developed particularly in the Breadline Britain studies (Mack and Lansley, 1985; Gordon and Pantazis, 1997; Gordon et al.”
Material and Financial Hardship and Income-Based Poverty Measures in the USA (2004, background): “More recently, there is agreement that all of the approaches capture different pieces of the puzzle, while no one single measure can yield a complete picture (Atkinson et al., 2002; Perry, 2002; Saunders, 2003).”
Towards new indicators of disadvantage: deprivation and social exclusion (2007, background): “…deprivation are observed at a particular point in time, no account is taken of the factors other than income that determine the standard of living (Perry, 2002, Figure 1), nor of the dynamics linking changes in people’s income and their standard of living and hence the deprivation actually…”
Improving the measurement of material deprivation at the European Union level (2016, background): “Perry (2002) argues that the degree of ‘importance’ of each item, at EU and country levels, can be measured by the proportion of people ‘wanting’ an item (i.e. the proportion of people who have the item PLUS the proportion of people who would like it but cannot afford it).”
Household incomes in New Zealand: trends in indicators of inequality and hardship 1982 to 2004 (2016, background): “43 See Perry (2002) for a summary of the international literature and for detailed discussion on the issue, and Iceland and Bauman (2007) for a recent perspective from the US.”
Income poverty and material deprivation in European countries (2011, methodology): “Most studies have argued that the populations identified as „income poor‟ or „materially deprived‟ do not perfectly overlap (see, for instance, Nolan and Whelan (1996) or Perry (2002)).”
Poverty and social exclusion: two sides of the same coin or dynamically interrelated processes? (2011, result): “These findings are in line with those of the previous literature (e.g. Perry, 2002; Whelan et al., 2004) that, using a number of statistical and visual inspection techniques, point out the lack of overlap in the proportion of individuals defined as poor and deprived/socially excluded at a given…”
Deep and persistent disadvantage in Australia (2013, unknown): “Sources: OECD (2008); Perry (2002).”