Income poverty and material hardship: How strong is the association?
By John Iceland, Kurt J. Bauman. 2007
241 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/82ed49d53679dd0027817359b66920b237cc143c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
In Sociology and Political Science
- Youngmi Kim
- B. Perry
- Baorong Guo
- James X. Sullivan
- Jin Huang
- Sandra K. Danziger
- Lesley J. Turner
- Bruce D. Meyer
Citations in the corpus
- Household Assets and Food Security: Evidence from the Survey of Program Dynamics (2011, methodology): “Iceland and Bauman (2007) particularly point out that food insecurity is more affected by short-term income than long-term income, which resonates the discussions on the effects of income volatility on the predicted probability of food insufficiency (Bania and Leete 2007; Gundersen and Gruber 2001)”
- Household incomes in New Zealand: trends in indicators of inequality and hardship 1982 to 2004 (2016, background): “43 See Perry (2002) for a summary of the international literature and for detailed discussion on the issue, and Iceland and Bauman (2007) for a recent perspective from the US.”
- Food insecurity and disability: Do economic resources matter? (2010, background): “In addition, several related findings demonstrate that household food insecurity is affected more by short-term income than by longterm income ( Iceland & Bauman, 2007 ), and negative income shocks increase the possibility of experiencing food insufficiency (Bania & Leete, 2007; Gundersen & Gruber, ”
- The Relationship between Income and Material Hardship (2008, methodology): “In the SIPP, we examine annual income for the reference period spanning 5 to 17 months prior to the interview that asks about hardship; these results are also consistent with those from the WES, as shown in Table 3.”