Grizzly bear–human conflicts in the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem, 1992–2000

By K. Gunther, M. Haroldson, K. Frey, S. Cain, J. Copeland, C. C. Schwartz. 2004

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Ultimate and proximate mechanisms underlying the occurrence of bears close to human settlements: review and management implications (2014, unknown): “There are numerous reports of brown and black bears utilizing garbage and other human-related foods near settlements (Swenson et al. 2000, Gunther et al. 2004, Sato et al. 2005, Greenleaf et al. 2009).”
By the Numbers: How is Recovery Defined by the US Endangered Species Act? (2012, background): “…of their historical ranges, reports suggest that it more likely results from societal intolerance of their recovery over a large area due to conflicts between wolves and livestock (Bangs and Shivik 2001, Gunther et al. 2004) and due to competition between wolves and hunters for big-game species.”
Spatial and temporal patterns of problem polar bears in Churchill, Manitoba (2009, background): “More frequent rates of human–bear interactions can result from individuals searching for alternate food sources (Rajpurohit and Krausman 2000; Gunther et al. 2004; Oka et al. 2004), especially when primary foods are limited or unavailable (McDonald and Fuller 2005).”