Racial Cognition and the Ethics of Implicit Bias
By Daniel Kelly, Erica Roedder. 2008
103 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3aa9b98beb73f99b40db516df0f7670a20047b45
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Sociology and Political Science
- Tamar SzaboGendler
- T. Gendler
- Natalie M. Daumeyer
- Xanni Brown
- Jennifer Saul
- J. Richeson
- I. Onyeador
- M. Verkuyten
Citations in the corpus
- Consequences of attributing discrimination to implicit vs. explicit bias (2019, background): “…implicit bias is a common pathway toward the reproduction of unequal and unjust societal outcomes based on race, gender, age, and other classifications, should motivate efforts to combat it structurally and institutionally, in addition to any individual-level efforts (see Kelly & Roedder, 2008).”
- On the epistemic costs of implicit bias (2011, background): “For a philosophically informed overview of some of this literature, see Kelly and Roedder (2008) and Kelly et al. (2010).”
- Alief in Action (and Reaction) (2008, background): “For an overview of some of the philosophical issues involved, with useful bibliography, see Kelly and Roedder, 2008 .”
- Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat, and Women in Philosophy (2013, background): “31 For a fuller discussion of blame and implicit bias, see Kelly and Roedder 2008 .”